GigaByte G32QC [ 20VM0-GG32QCBA-1EKR] vs Dell P2719HC [2719-2439]
GigaByte G32QC [ 20VM0-GG32QCBA-1EKR]
76%
DeviceList score
vs
Dell P2719HC [2719-2439]
71%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of GigaByte G32QC [ 20VM0-GG32QCBA-1EKR] and Dell P2719HC [2719-2439] and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2025 year.
GigaByte G32QC [ 20VM0-GG32QCBA-1EKR] benefits
|
Screen diagonal |
|
31.5 ''
4.5 '' (16.7%) better
vs
27 ''
|
|
Brightness |
|
350 Cd/m²
50 Cd/m² (16.7%) better
vs
300 Cd/m²
|
|
Pixel response time, ms |
|
1 ms
-4 ms (-80%) better
vs
5 ms
|
|
Pixel Size |
|
272 μm
-39 μm (-12.5%) better
vs
311 μm
|
|
The maximum refresh rate of the screen |
|
165 Hz
105 Hz (175%) better
vs
60 Hz
|
|
Curved screen |
|
vs
|
|
Vision protection technology |
|
vs
|
|
Pixel density |
|
93 ppi
11 ppi (13.4%) better
vs
82 ppi
|
|
Frequency at maximum resolution |
|
165 Hz
105 Hz (175%) better
vs
60 Hz
|
Dell P2719HC [2719-2439] benefits
Winner in comparison
|
Price-quality ratio |
|
21.2 %
5 % (30.9%) better
vs
16.2 %
|
|
Price at the time of release |
|
294.7 USD
-107.2 USD (-26.7%) better
vs
401.9 USD
|
|
Number of USB ports |
|
5
3 (150%) better
vs
2
|
|
Portrait mode |
|
vs
|
|
Swivel stand |
|
vs
|
|
Power consumption during operation |
|
18 Wt
-52 Wt (-74.3%) better
vs
70 Wt
|
|
Power consumption in sleep mode |
|
0.3 Wt
-0.2 Wt (-40%) better
vs
0.5 Wt
|
|
Width with stand |
|
609.9 mm
-100.6 mm (-14.2%) better
vs
710.5 mm
|
|
Minimum height with stand |
|
394.3 mm
-157.9 mm (-28.6%) better
vs
552.2 mm
|
|
Maximum height with stand |
|
524.3 mm
-27.9 mm (-5.1%) better
vs
552.2 mm
|
|
Thickness with stand |
|
185 mm
-49.8 mm (-21.2%) better
vs
234.8 mm
|
|
Width without stand |
|
609.9 mm
-100.6 mm (-14.2%) better
vs
710.5 mm
|
|
Height without stand |
|
363 mm
-60.3 mm (-14.2%) better
vs
423.3 mm
|
|
Thickness without stand |
|
42.8 mm
-60 mm (-58.4%) better
vs
102.8 mm
|
|
Weight without stand |
|
4.67 kg
-0.83 kg (-15.1%) better
vs
5.5 kg
|
