Home / Water heater / HAIER ES50V-A5 vs Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG

HAIER ES50V-A5 vs Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG

HAIER ES50V-A5
65%
DeviceList score
vs
Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG
46%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of HAIER ES50V-A5 and Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
HAIER ES50V-A5 benefits
Winner in comparison
Price-quality ratio
76.7
63.1 (464%) better
vs
13.6
USD
147
-113 (-43.5%) better
vs
260
Temperature display
vs
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
80 °C
5 °C (6.7%) better
vs
75 °C
Heating time
110 min
-30 min (-21.4%) better
vs
140 min
Display
vs
Thermometer
vs
Height
39 cm
-75.5 cm (-65.9%) better
vs
114.5 cm
Weight
17 kg
-5.7 kg (-25.1%) better
vs
22.7 kg
Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG benefits
Tank capacity
100 l
50 l (100%) better
vs
50 l
Rated power
2 kWt
0.5 kWt (33.3%) better
vs
1.5 kWt
Check valve
vs
Width
49.6 cm
-14.1 cm (-22.1%) better
vs
63.7 cm
Depth
39.3 cm
-0.7 cm (-1.7%) better
vs
40 cm

Comparison of all specifications

HAIER ES50V-A5 Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG
Limiting the heating temperature
Overheating protection
Check valve
Self-diagnosis
Safety shut-off device
Magnesium anode
Shower hose
Mounting elements included
Shower head
Display
Power on display
Heating indication
Accelerated heating
Crane
Thermometer
Distance between mounting holes
200 270
Distance from the middle of the top mount to the top
160 260
Distance between mounts
no data 550
Width
63.7 cm 49.6 cm
-14.1 cm (-22.1%) better
Height
39 cm
-75.5 cm (-65.9%) better
114.5 cm
Depth
40 cm 39.3 cm
-0.7 cm (-1.7%) better
Weight
17 kg
-5.7 kg (-25.1%) better
22.7 kg
Tank capacity
50 l 100 l
50 l (100%) better
Control from your smartphone
Maximum water pressure
8 Bar 8 Bar
Minimum water pressure
no data 0.6 Bar
Temperature display
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
80 °C
5 °C (6.7%) better
75 °C
Heating time
110 min
-30 min (-21.4%) better
140 min
Dry Teng
Water resistance class
IPX4 IPX4
USD
147
-113 (-43.5%) better
260
Price-quality ratio
76.7
63.1 (464%) better
13.6
Rated power
1.5 kWt 2 kWt
0.5 kWt (33.3%) better
Popular comparisons