Home / Mobile Processor / MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

MediaTek Dimensity 1100
76%
DeviceList score
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
84%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of MediaTek Dimensity 1100 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 benefits
GPU frequency
850
175 (25.9%) better
vs
675
Memory frequency
4266
1516 (55.1%) better
vs
2750
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 benefits
Winner in comparison
CPU
188510
13127 (7.5%) better
vs
175383
GPU
244555
13401 (5.8%) better
vs
231154
Total AnTuTu score
697309
26277 (3.9%) better
vs
671032
Frequency
3200
600 (23.1%) better
vs
2600

Comparison of all specifications

MediaTek Dimensity 1100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
GPU frequency
850
175 (25.9%) better
675
FLOPS
no data 1372
DirectX Version
12 12
OpenCL Version
2.0 2.0
Vulcan version
1.1 1.1
shader blocks
144 512
Computing blocks
9 2
Architecture
Valhall Adreno 600
GPU
Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 650
Tire
4x 16 Бит 4x 16 Бит
Memory frequency
4266
1516 (55.1%) better
2750
Memory type
LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Bandwidth
no data До 44 Гбит/сек
Volume
До 16 ГБ До 16 ГБ
L3 cache
no data 4 МБ
L1 cache
no data 1 КБ
L2 cache
no data 1.8 МБ
TDP
10 Вт 10 Вт
Process technology
6 нм 7 нм
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Frequency
2600 3200
600 (23.1%) better
Number of Cores
8 8
Architecture
4x 2.6 ГГц – Cortex-A78
4x 2 ГГц – Cortex-A55
1x 3.2 ГГц – Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)
3x 2.42 ГГц – Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)
4x 1.8 ГГц – Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4G support
LTE Cat. 19 LTE Cat. 24
Modem
no data X55
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Bluetooth
5.2 5.2
Wi-Fi
6 6
Download speed
До 150 Мбит/с До 316 Мбит/с
Download speed
До 1600 Мбит/с До 2500 Мбит/с
5G support
Да Да
Model number
MT6891Z/CZA SM8250-AC
Class
Флагман Флагман
Audio
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Codec support
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video playback
4K при 60FPS 8K при 30FPS, 4K при 60FPS
Video recording
4K при 60FPS 8K при 30FPS, 4K при 60FPS
Max. camera resolution
1x 108МП, 2x 32МП 1x 200МП, 2x 25МП
Max. display resolution
2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
Drive type
UFS 3.1 UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
neural processor
Да Hexagon 698
HTML 5
3.91 Mnodes/s 3 Mnodes/s
SQLite
1010.2 Krows/s 989.1 Krows/s
Camera shooting
36.75 images/s 28 images/s
Machine learning
57.15 images/s 56.95 images/s
Speech recognition
51.5 words/s 54.7 words/s
Face detection
29.35 images/s 25.25 images/s
Image compression
180.5 Mpixels/s 180.6 Mpixels/s
Total AnTuTu score
671032 697309
26277 (3.9%) better
UX
140457 149678
Memory
118538 111930
GPU
231154 244555
13401 (5.8%) better
CPU
175383 188510
13127 (7.5%) better
Score
3981 4260
Graphics test
23 FPS 25 FPS
Stability
99% 90%
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang
60 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact
48 FPS
[Ultra]
49 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz
83 FPS
[Ultra]
107 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends
68 FPS
[Ultra]
102 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite
27 FPS
[High]
27 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile
60 FPS
[High]
59 FPS
[Ultra]
PUBG Mobile
58 FPS
[Low]
88 FPS
[Ultra]
Popular comparisons