Home / Mobile Processor / MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G

MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G

MediaTek Helio G70
41%
DeviceList score
vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
62%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of MediaTek Helio G70 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
MediaTek Helio G70 benefits
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G benefits
Winner in comparison
CPU
118893
47116 (65.6%) better
vs
71777
GPU
94482
61456 (186.1%) better
vs
33026
Total AnTuTu score
388734
179788 (86%) better
vs
208946
Frequency
2200
200 (10%) better
vs
2000
GPU frequency
825
5 (0.59999999999999%) better
vs
820
Memory frequency
2133
333 (18.5%) better
vs
1800
Wi-Fi
6
1 (20%) better
vs
5
Bluetooth
5.1
0.1 (2%) better
vs
5

Comparison of all specifications

MediaTek Helio G70 Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
GPU frequency
820 825
5 (0.59999999999999%) better
FLOPS
54.6 no data
DirectX Version
12 12
OpenCL Version
2.0 2.0
Vulcan version
1.0 1.1
shader blocks
32 128
Computing blocks
2 2
Architecture
Bifrost Adreno 600
GPU
Mali-G52 2EEMC2 Adreno 619
Tire
2x 16 Бит 2x 16 Бит
Memory frequency
1800 2133
333 (18.5%) better
Memory type
LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Bandwidth
До 13.41 Гбит/сек До 17 Гбит/сек
Volume
До 8 ГБ До 12 ГБ
L3 cache
1 МБ no data
Number of transistors
5.5 млрд. no data
L2 cache
320 КБ no data
TDP
5 Вт 5 Вт
Process technology
12 нм 8 нм
Instruction set
ARMv8-A ARMv8.3-A
Frequency
2000 2200
200 (10%) better
Number of Cores
8 8
Architecture
2x 2 ГГц – Cortex-A75
6x 1.7 ГГц – Cortex-A55
2x 2.2 ГГц – Kryo 570 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.8 ГГц – Kryo 570 Silver (Cortex-A55)
4G support
LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 18
Modem
no data X52
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Bluetooth
5 5.1
0.1 (2%) better
Wi-Fi
5 6
1 (20%) better
Download speed
До 100 Мбит/с До 210 Мбит/с
Download speed
До 300 Мбит/с До 1200 Мбит/с
5G support
Нет Да
Model number
MT6769V/CB SM7225
Class
Средний класс Средний класс
Audio
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Codec support
H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video playback
2K при 30FPS 4K при 30FPS
Video recording
2K при 30FPS 4K при 30FPS
Max. camera resolution
1x 48МП, 2x 16МП 1x 192МП, 2x 32МП
Max. display resolution
2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Drive type
eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0
neural processor
Да Hexagon 694
HTML 5
1.5 Mnodes/s 2.38 Mnodes/s
SQLite
395.3 Krows/s 612.55 Krows/s
Camera shooting
9.43 images/s 18.5 images/s
Machine learning
18 images/s 28.55 images/s
Speech recognition
24.4 words/s 30.1 words/s
Face detection
11.6 images/s 18.1 images/s
Image compression
79.7 Mpixels/s 119.5 Mpixels/s
Total AnTuTu score
208946 388734
179788 (86%) better
UX
59110 104475
Memory
43017 70240
GPU
33026 94482
61456 (186.1%) better
CPU
71777 118893
47116 (65.6%) better
Score
594 1116
Graphics test
3 FPS 6 FPS
Stability
no data 99%
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang
53 FPS
[High]
56 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz
52 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Shadowgun Legends
52 FPS
[Low]
61 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite
no data 28 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile
30 FPS
[Low]
37 FPS
[High]
PUBG Mobile
31 FPS
[High]
58 FPS
[High]
Popular comparisons