Home / Mobile Processor / Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A15 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Apple A15 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 2200
97%
DeviceList score
vs
Apple A15 Bionic
94%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple A15 Bionic and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
Samsung Exynos 2200 benefits
Winner in comparison
CPU
231679
15349 (7.1%) better
vs
216330
GPU
412728
83851 (25.5%) better
vs
328877
Total AnTuTu score
970769
169413 (21.1%) better
vs
801356
Number of Cores
8
2 (33.3%) better
vs
6
GPU frequency
1300
100 (8.3%) better
vs
1200
Bluetooth
5.2
0.2 (4%) better
vs
5
Apple A15 Bionic benefits
Score
9558
2658 (38.5%) better
vs
6900
Frequency
3223
423 (15.1%) better
vs
2800
Memory frequency
4266
1066 (33.3%) better
vs
3200

Comparison of all specifications

Samsung Exynos 2200 Apple A15 Bionic
GPU frequency
1300
100 (8.3%) better
1200
DirectX Version
12 no data
OpenCL Version
2.0 no data
Vulcan version
1.1 no data
shader blocks
no data 640
Computing blocks
no data 5
Architecture
RDNA 2 no data
GPU
Samsung Xclipse 920 Apple GPU
Memory frequency
3200 4266
1066 (33.3%) better
Memory type
LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Bandwidth
no data До 42.7 Гбит/сек
Volume
До 24 ГБ До 8 ГБ
Number of transistors
no data 15 млрд.
L2 cache
no data 8 МБ
TDP
no data 6 Вт
Process technology
4 нм 5 нм
Instruction set
ARMv9-A ARMv8.5-A
Frequency
2800 3223
423 (15.1%) better
Number of Cores
8
2 (33.3%) better
6
Architecture
1x 2.8 ГГц – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 ГГц – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 ГГц – Cortex-A510
2x 3.223 ГГц – Avalanche
4x 1.82 ГГц – Blizzard
4G support
LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Bluetooth
5.2
0.2 (4%) better
5
Wi-Fi
6 6
Download speed
До 422 Мбит/с no data
Download speed
До 3000 Мбит/с no data
5G support
Да Да
Model number
s5e9925 APL1W07
Class
Флагман Флагман
Audio
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Codec support
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, Motion JPEG
Video playback
8K при 60FPS, 4K при 240FPS 4K при 60FPS
Video recording
8K при 30FPS, 4K при 120FPS 4K при 60FPS
Max. camera resolution
1x 200МП no data
Max. display resolution
3840 x 2160 no data
Drive type
UFS 3.1 NVMe
neural processor
Да Neural Engine
Score
6900 9558
2658 (38.5%) better
Graphics test
41 FPS 57 FPS
Stability
63% 81%
Total AnTuTu score
970769
169413 (21.1%) better
801356
UX
164423 133383
Memory
161800 122242
GPU
412728
83851 (25.5%) better
328877
CPU
231679
15349 (7.1%) better
216330
Popular comparisons