Home / Water heater / Stiebel SH 15 SL vs Ariston SSGA 80 R

Stiebel SH 15 SL vs Ariston SSGA 80 R

Stiebel SH 15 SL
50%
DeviceList score
vs
Ariston SSGA 80 R
73%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Stiebel SH 15 SL and Ariston SSGA 80 R and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
Stiebel SH 15 SL benefits
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
82 °C
12 °C (17.1%) better
vs
70 °C
Width
31.6 cm
-17.9 cm (-36.2%) better
vs
49.5 cm
Height
60 cm
-19.5 cm (-24.5%) better
vs
79.5 cm
Depth
29.5 cm
-21.5 cm (-42.2%) better
vs
51 cm
Weight
10.5 kg
-20.5 kg (-66.1%) better
vs
31 kg
Ariston SSGA 80 R benefits
Winner in comparison
Price-quality ratio
14.3
8.2 (134.4%) better
vs
6.1
USD
400
-121 (-23.2%) better
vs
521
Tank capacity
75 l
60 l (400%) better
vs
15 l
Maximum water pressure
8 Bar
1 Bar (14.3%) better
vs
7 Bar
Minimum water pressure
0.2 Bar
-0.8 Bar (-80%) better
vs
1 Bar
Temperature display
vs
Rated power
4.4 kWt
1.4 kWt (46.7%) better
vs
3 kWt

Comparison of all specifications

Stiebel SH 15 SL Ariston SSGA 80 R
Gas control
Limiting the heating temperature
Overheating protection
Check valve
Self-diagnosis
Safety shut-off device
Magnesium anode
Shower hose
Gas inlet
no data 3/8"
Water inlet
no data 3/4"
Connecting the smoke extraction system
no data 81 mm
Shower head
Display
Power on display
Heating indication
Accelerated heating
Crane
Thermometer
Width
31.6 cm
-17.9 cm (-36.2%) better
49.5 cm
Height
60 cm
-19.5 cm (-24.5%) better
79.5 cm
Depth
29.5 cm
-21.5 cm (-42.2%) better
51 cm
Weight
10.5 kg
-20.5 kg (-66.1%) better
31 kg
Display
Thermometer
Natural gas consumption
no data 0.55 m³/h
Tank capacity
15 l 75 l
60 l (400%) better
Control from your smartphone
Maximum water pressure
7 Bar 8 Bar
1 Bar (14.3%) better
Minimum water pressure
1 Bar 0.2 Bar
-0.8 Bar (-80%) better
Temperature display
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
82 °C
12 °C (17.1%) better
70 °C
Dry Teng
Water resistance class
IP24 no data
Maximum gas pressure
no data 20 mBar
Liquefied gas consumption
no data 0.404 kg/h
USD
521 400
-121 (-23.2%) better
Price-quality ratio
6.1 14.3
8.2 (134.4%) better
Rated power
3 kWt 4.4 kWt
1.4 kWt (46.7%) better
Performance
no data 11 l/min
Popular comparisons