Home / Water heater / Timberk SWH FSM5 30 V vs Metalac KLASSA CH 50 R

Timberk SWH FSM5 30 V vs Metalac KLASSA CH 50 R

Timberk SWH FSM5 30 V
74%
DeviceList score
vs
Metalac KLASSA CH 50 R
54%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Timberk SWH FSM5 30 V and Metalac KLASSA CH 50 R and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
Timberk SWH FSM5 30 V benefits
Winner in comparison
Price-quality ratio
92.3
62.9 (213.9%) better
vs
29.4
Maximum water pressure
7 Bar
1 Bar (16.7%) better
vs
6 Bar
Temperature display
vs
Heating time
22 min
-88 min (-80%) better
vs
110 min
Display
vs
Limiting the heating temperature
vs
Overheating protection
vs
Self-diagnosis
vs
Width
43.5 cm
-1.9 cm (-4.2%) better
vs
45.4 cm
Height
57 cm
-7 cm (-10.9%) better
vs
64 cm
Depth
23.8 cm
-24.2 cm (-50.4%) better
vs
48 cm
Weight
9.8 kg
-12.4 kg (-55.9%) better
vs
22.2 kg
Metalac KLASSA CH 50 R benefits
Tank capacity
50 l
20 l (66.7%) better
vs
30 l
Minimum water pressure
0.6 Bar
-0.1 Bar (-14.3%) better
vs
0.7 Bar
Dry Teng
vs

Comparison of all specifications

Timberk SWH FSM5 30 V Metalac KLASSA CH 50 R
Limiting the heating temperature
Overheating protection
Check valve
Self-diagnosis
Safety shut-off device
Magnesium anode
Shower hose
Mounting elements included
Shower head
Display
Power on display
Heating indication
Accelerated heating
Crane
Thermometer
Width
43.5 cm
-1.9 cm (-4.2%) better
45.4 cm
Height
57 cm
-7 cm (-10.9%) better
64 cm
Depth
23.8 cm
-24.2 cm (-50.4%) better
48 cm
Weight
9.8 kg
-12.4 kg (-55.9%) better
22.2 kg
Tank capacity
30 l 50 l
20 l (66.7%) better
Control from your smartphone
Maximum water pressure
7 Bar
1 Bar (16.7%) better
6 Bar
Minimum water pressure
0.7 Bar 0.6 Bar
-0.1 Bar (-14.3%) better
Temperature display
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
75 °C 75 °C
Heating time
22 min
-88 min (-80%) better
110 min
Dry Teng
Water resistance class
IPX4 IPX4
USD
no data 179
Price-quality ratio
92.3
62.9 (213.9%) better
29.4
Rated power
2 kWt 2 kWt
Popular comparisons