Home / Water heater / Timberk WHEL 3 OSC vs Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG

Timberk WHEL 3 OSC vs Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG

Timberk WHEL 3 OSC
69%
DeviceList score
vs
Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG
46%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Timberk WHEL 3 OSC and Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
Timberk WHEL 3 OSC benefits
Winner in comparison
Price-quality ratio
75.6
62 (455.9%) better
vs
13.6
USD
27
-233 (-89.6%) better
vs
260
Rated power
3.5 kWt
1.5 kWt (75%) better
vs
2 kWt
Accelerated heating
vs
Crane
vs
Shower head
vs
Shower hose
vs
Width
27 cm
-22.6 cm (-45.6%) better
vs
49.6 cm
Height
15.5 cm
-99 cm (-86.5%) better
vs
114.5 cm
Depth
10.5 cm
-28.8 cm (-73.3%) better
vs
39.3 cm
Weight
1.5 kg
-21.2 kg (-93.4%) better
vs
22.7 kg
Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG benefits
Maximum water pressure
8 Bar
2 Bar (33.3%) better
vs
6 Bar
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
75 °C
15 °C (25%) better
vs
60 °C

Comparison of all specifications

Timberk WHEL 3 OSC Timberk T-WSS100-N27C-VG
Limiting the heating temperature
Overheating protection
Check valve
Self-diagnosis
Magnesium anode
Shower hose
Mounting elements included
Shower head
Display
Power on display
Heating indication
Accelerated heating
Crane
Thermometer
Distance between mounting holes
no data 270
Distance from the middle of the top mount to the top
no data 260
Distance between mounts
no data 550
Width
27 cm
-22.6 cm (-45.6%) better
49.6 cm
Height
15.5 cm
-99 cm (-86.5%) better
114.5 cm
Depth
10.5 cm
-28.8 cm (-73.3%) better
39.3 cm
Weight
1.5 kg
-21.2 kg (-93.4%) better
22.7 kg
Tank capacity
no data 100 l
Control from your smartphone
Maximum water pressure
6 Bar 8 Bar
2 Bar (33.3%) better
Minimum water pressure
no data 0.6 Bar
Temperature display
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
60 °C 75 °C
15 °C (25%) better
Heating time
no data 140 min
Water resistance class
IPX4 IPX4
USD
27
-233 (-89.6%) better
260
Price-quality ratio
75.6
62 (455.9%) better
13.6
Rated power
3.5 kWt
1.5 kWt (75%) better
2 kWt
Popular comparisons