Home / Water heater / Timberk WHEL 7 OSC vs Gorenje GBFU 100 B6

Timberk WHEL 7 OSC vs Gorenje GBFU 100 B6

Timberk WHEL 7 OSC
78%
DeviceList score
vs
Gorenje GBFU 100 B6
37%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Timberk WHEL 7 OSC and Gorenje GBFU 100 B6 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
Timberk WHEL 7 OSC benefits
Winner in comparison
Price-quality ratio
89.1
78.2 (717.4%) better
vs
10.9
Minimum water pressure
0.3 Bar
-0.2 Bar (-40%) better
vs
0.5 Bar
Heating time
1 min
-234 min (-99.6%) better
vs
235 min
Rated power
6.5 kWt
4.5 kWt (225%) better
vs
2 kWt
Accelerated heating
vs
Crane
vs
Shower head
vs
Shower hose
vs
Overheating protection
vs
Self-diagnosis
vs
Width
27.2 cm
-18.2 cm (-40.1%) better
vs
45.4 cm
Height
15.9 cm
-78.9 cm (-83.2%) better
vs
94.8 cm
Depth
11.2 cm
-34.9 cm (-75.7%) better
vs
46.1 cm
Weight
1.19 kg
-32.81 kg (-96.5%) better
vs
34 kg
Gorenje GBFU 100 B6 benefits
Temperature display
vs
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
75 °C
10 °C (15.4%) better
vs
65 °C
Dry Teng
vs
Heating indication
vs
Thermometer
vs

Comparison of all specifications

Timberk WHEL 7 OSC Gorenje GBFU 100 B6
Limiting the heating temperature
Overheating protection
Check valve
Self-diagnosis
Safety shut-off device
Magnesium anode
Shower hose
Shower head
Display
Power on display
Heating indication
Accelerated heating
Crane
Thermometer
Width
27.2 cm
-18.2 cm (-40.1%) better
45.4 cm
Height
15.9 cm
-78.9 cm (-83.2%) better
94.8 cm
Depth
11.2 cm
-34.9 cm (-75.7%) better
46.1 cm
Weight
1.19 kg
-32.81 kg (-96.5%) better
34 kg
Tank capacity
no data 100 l
Control from your smartphone
Maximum water pressure
6 Bar 6 Bar
Minimum water pressure
0.3 Bar
-0.2 Bar (-40%) better
0.5 Bar
Temperature display
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
65 °C 75 °C
10 °C (15.4%) better
Heating time
1 min
-234 min (-99.6%) better
235 min
Dry Teng
Water resistance class
IPX4 IPX4
USD
no data 235
Price-quality ratio
89.1
78.2 (717.4%) better
10.9
Rated power
6.5 kWt
4.5 kWt (225%) better
2 kWt
Popular comparisons