Home / HDD / WD Gold [WD181KRYZ] vs Toshiba X300 [HDWR160EZSTA]

WD Gold [WD181KRYZ] vs Toshiba X300 [HDWR160EZSTA]

WD Gold [WD181KRYZ]
63%
DeviceList score
vs
Toshiba X300 [HDWR160EZSTA]
39%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of WD Gold [WD181KRYZ] and Toshiba X300 [HDWR160EZSTA] and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2024 year.
WD Gold [WD181KRYZ] benefits
Winner in comparison
Price-quality ratio
85.2
58.3 (216.7%) better
vs
26.9
HDD Capacity
18 Tb
12 Tb (200%) better
vs
6 Tb
Cache memory size
512 Mb
256 Mb (100%) better
vs
256 Mb
Maximum data transfer rate
269 Mb/s
69 Mb/s (34.5%) better
vs
200 Mb/s
Optimization for RAID arrays
vs
With helium filling
vs
Maximum power consumption
6.5 Wt
-3.42 Wt (-34.5%) better
vs
9.92 Wt
Weight
690 g
-80 g (-10.4%) better
vs
770 g
Toshiba X300 [HDWR160EZSTA] benefits
Impact resistance during operation
70 G
20 G (40%) better
vs
50 G
Idle noise level
34 dB
-2 dB (-5.6%) better
vs
36 dB

Comparison of all specifications

WD Gold [WD181KRYZ] Toshiba X300 [HDWR160EZSTA]
Impact resistance during operation
50 G 70 G
20 G (40%) better
With helium filling
Idle noise level
36 dB 34 dB
-2 dB (-5.6%) better
Noise level during operation
36 dB no data
Weight
690 g
-80 g (-10.4%) better
770 g
Thickness
26.1 mm 26.1 mm
Length
147 mm 147 mm
Width
101.6 mm 101.6 mm
Maximum power consumption
6.5 Wt
-3.42 Wt (-34.5%) better
9.92 Wt
Price-quality ratio
85.2
58.3 (216.7%) better
26.9
USD
no data 160
Optimization for RAID arrays
Interface bandwidth
6 Gbit/s 6 Gbit/s
Interface
SATA III SATA III
NCQ Support
Average delay time (Latency)
no data 4.17 ms
Maximum data transfer rate
269 Mb/s
69 Mb/s (34.5%) better
200 Mb/s
Spindle speed
7200 rpm 7200 rpm
Cache memory size
512 Mb
256 Mb (100%) better
256 Mb
HDD Capacity
18 Tb
12 Tb (200%) better
6 Tb
Popular comparisons