Price-quality ratio |
85.2
58.3 (216.7%) better
vs
26.9
|
HDD Capacity |
18 Tb
12 Tb (200%) better
vs
6 Tb
|
Cache memory size |
512 Mb
256 Mb (100%) better
vs
256 Mb
|
Maximum data transfer rate |
269 Mb/s
69 Mb/s (34.5%) better
vs
200 Mb/s
|
Optimization for RAID arrays |
vs
|
With helium filling |
vs
|
Maximum power consumption |
6.5 Wt
-3.42 Wt (-34.5%) better
vs
9.92 Wt
|
Weight |
690 g
-80 g (-10.4%) better
vs
770 g
|
Impact resistance during operation |
70 G
20 G (40%) better
vs
50 G
|
Idle noise level |
34 dB
-2 dB (-5.6%) better
vs
36 dB
|
WD Gold [WD181KRYZ] | Toshiba X300 [HDWR160EZSTA] |
Mechanics and reliability | |
Impact resistance during operation | |
50 G | 70 G
20 G (40%) better
|
With helium filling | |
Idle noise level | |
36 dB | 34 dB
-2 dB (-5.6%) better
|
Noise level during operation | |
36 dB | no data |
Speed and access time |
Dimensions, weight | |
Weight | |
690 g
-80 g (-10.4%) better
|
770 g |
Thickness | |
26.1 mm | 26.1 mm |
Length | |
147 mm | 147 mm |
Width | |
101.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Additional information | |
Maximum power consumption | |
6.5 Wt
-3.42 Wt (-34.5%) better
|
9.92 Wt |
General parameters | |
Price-quality ratio | |
85.2
58.3 (216.7%) better
|
26.9 |
USD | |
no data | 160 |
Interface | |
Optimization for RAID arrays | |
Interface bandwidth | |
6 Gbit/s | 6 Gbit/s |
Interface | |
SATA III | SATA III |
Performance | |
NCQ Support | |
Average delay time (Latency) | |
no data | 4.17 ms |
Maximum data transfer rate | |
269 Mb/s
69 Mb/s (34.5%) better
|
200 Mb/s |
Storage device | |
Spindle speed | |
7200 rpm | 7200 rpm |
Cache memory size | |
512 Mb
256 Mb (100%) better
|
256 Mb |
HDD Capacity | |
18 Tb
12 Tb (200%) better
|
6 Tb |