Home / Phone / Nubia Red Magic 3 vs ZTE Blade V30

Nubia Red Magic 3 vs ZTE Blade V30

Nubia Red Magic 3
38%
DeviceList score
vs
ZTE Blade V30
39%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Nubia Red Magic 3 and ZTE Blade V30 and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2023 year.
Nubia Red Magic 3 benefits
Technological process
7 nm
-5 nm (-41.7%) better
vs
12 nm
CPU Frequency
2840 MGz
840 MGz (42%) better
vs
2000 MGz
Maximum RAM Capacity
6 Gb
2 Gb (50%) better
vs
4 Gb
AnTuTu
455743
245743 (117%) better
vs
210000
ZTE Blade V30 benefits
Winner in comparison
Width
77.8 mm
-0.7 mm (-0.90000000000001%) better
vs
78.5 mm
Height
165.8 mm
-5.9 mm (-3.4%) better
vs
171.7 mm
Thickness
8.9 mm
-0.8 mm (-8.2%) better
vs
9.7 mm
Weight
193 g
-22 g (-10.2%) better
vs
215 g
Maximum built-in memory
128 Gb
64 Gb (100%) better
vs
64 Gb
Diagonal size
6.67 inches
0.02 inches (0.3%) better
vs
6.65 inches
Display area
83 %
3 % (3.8%) better
vs
80 %
Camera matrix
64 MP
16 MP (33.3%) better
vs
48 MP

Comparison of all specifications

Nubia Red Magic 3 ZTE Blade V30
Diagonal size
The larger the diagonal of the screen — the more comfortable the interaction with the device, especially it is worth noting watching videos and games.
6.65 inches 6.67 inches
0.02 inches (0.3%) better
Resolution
1080 x 2340 px 1080 x 2400 px
Aspect ratio
19.5:9 20:9
Pixel density
The high pixel density per inch allows you to display information on the screen with clearer details.
388 ppi 388 ppi
Display area
The area percentage occupied by the screen of the device with respect to the front side.
80 % 83 %
3 % (3.8%) better
Width
We recommend choosing the width of the device based on the length of your fingers, too wide models will not allow you to comfortably interact with one hand across the entire surface of the display.
78.5 mm 77.8 mm
-0.7 mm (-0.90000000000001%) better
Height
Depending on the length of your fingers, the height of the device may affect the comfort of using one hand.
171.7 mm 165.8 mm
-5.9 mm (-3.4%) better
Thickness
The thinner the smartphone, the more pleasant it is to hold in your hands. Usually this value correlates with the weight of the device.
9.7 mm 8.9 mm
-0.8 mm (-8.2%) better
Weight
The weight of the device can greatly affect the comfort of using one hand, modern smartphones tend to reduce weight.
215 g 193 g
-22 g (-10.2%) better
SoC (System on Chip)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Unisoc Tiger T618
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Technological process
The smaller the process, the more advanced the technology and the more transistors are placed on a chip of the same area, which gives higher performance.
7 nm
-5 nm (-41.7%) better
12 nm
CPU
The processor is responsible for interpreting and executing instructions contained in software applications.
1x Kryo 485 2 2 x ARM Cortex
CPU Frequency
The frequency describes the speed, the more - the more cycles per second the processor processes and program instructions are executed.
2840 MGz
840 MGz (42%) better
2000 MGz
Maximum RAM Capacity
RAM is required to store and quickly process data of the operating system and running applications at the moment. A large amount of RAM provides a good performance device.
6 Gb
2 Gb (50%) better
4 Gb
AnTuTu
Scores in the popular AnTuTu test show the potential performance of the device under high load. The more points the device scores, the better.
455743
245743 (117%) better
210000
Type
Li-Polymer Li-Ion
Fast charging
Capacity
Maximum charge that can save the battery
5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Camera matrix
The number of megapixels depends on the size and resolution of photos and videos.
48 MP 64 MP
16 MP (33.3%) better
Maximum built-in memory
The more internal memory, the more applications, video and other data you can store on your device.
64 Gb 128 Gb
64 Gb (100%) better
Popular comparisons