Home / Water heater / TESY GCR 802724D E31 EC vs Electrolux GWH 10 High Performance Eco

TESY GCR 802724D E31 EC vs Electrolux GWH 10 High Performance Eco

TESY GCR 802724D E31 EC
53%
DeviceList score
vs
We compared the characteristics of TESY GCR 802724D E31 EC and Electrolux GWH 10 High Performance Eco and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2025 year.
TESY GCR 802724D E31 EC benefits
Price-quality ratio
84.3
29.2 (53%) better
vs
55.1
Tank capacity
65 l
65 l (INF%) better
vs
0 l
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
80 °C
25 °C (45.5%) better
vs
55 °C
Electrolux GWH 10 High Performance Eco benefits
Winner in comparison
Rated power
20 kWt
17.6 kWt (733.3%) better
vs
2.4 kWt
Width
33 cm
-16 cm (-32.7%) better
vs
49 cm
Height
50 cm
-55.7 cm (-52.7%) better
vs
105.7 cm
Depth
18.8 cm
-9.2 cm (-32.9%) better
vs
28 cm
Weight
8.18 kg
-24.92 kg (-75.3%) better
vs
33.1 kg

Comparison of all specifications

TESY GCR 802724D E31 EC Electrolux GWH 10 High Performance Eco
Gas control
Limiting the heating temperature
Overheating protection
Self-diagnosis
Magnesium anode
Shower hose
Mounting elements included
Gas inlet
no data 1/2"
Water inlet
no data 1/2"
Connecting the smoke extraction system
no data 110 mm
Shower head
Display
Power on display
Heating indication
Crane
Width
49 cm 33 cm
-16 cm (-32.7%) better
Height
105.7 cm 50 cm
-55.7 cm (-52.7%) better
Depth
28 cm 18.8 cm
-9.2 cm (-32.9%) better
Weight
33.1 kg 8.18 kg
-24.92 kg (-75.3%) better
Display
Thermometer
Natural gas consumption
no data 2.2 m³/h
Tank capacity
65 l
65 l (INF%) better
no data
Control from your smartphone
Maximum water pressure
no data 8 Bar
Minimum water pressure
no data 0.15 Bar
Temperature display
Maximum water heating temperature (C)
80 °C
25 °C (45.5%) better
55 °C
Heating time
122 min no data
Maximum gas pressure
no data 13 mBar
Minimum gas pressure
no data 6.8 mBar
Liquefied gas consumption
no data 0 kg/h
USD
no data 137
Price-quality ratio
84.3
29.2 (53%) better
55.1
Rated power
2.4 kWt 20 kWt
17.6 kWt (733.3%) better
Performance
no data 10 l/min
Popular comparisons