Home / Hood / Weissgauff Assy 60 TC BL vs FRANKE FMYPL 906 BK

Weissgauff Assy 60 TC BL vs FRANKE FMYPL 906 BK

Weissgauff Assy 60 TC BL
69%
DeviceList score
vs
FRANKE FMYPL 906 BK
34%
DeviceList score
We compared the characteristics of Weissgauff Assy 60 TC BL and FRANKE FMYPL 906 BK and compiled a list of advantages and a comparison table for you. Find out which one to choose in 2025 year.
Weissgauff Assy 60 TC BL benefits
Winner in comparison
Price-quality ratio
55.7
52.6 (1696.8%) better
vs
3.1
USD
121
-1563 (-92.8%) better
vs
1684
Maximum performance
1000 m³/h
190 m³/h (23.5%) better
vs
810 m³/h
Display
vs
Number of lighting lamps
2
1 (100%) better
vs
1
Noise level
49 dB
-23 dB (-31.9%) better
vs
72 dB
Embedding width
59.5 cm
-30.3 cm (-33.7%) better
vs
89.8 cm
Embedding depth
37.8 cm
-2.1 cm (-5.3%) better
vs
39.9 cm
Width
59.5 cm
-30.3 cm (-33.7%) better
vs
89.8 cm
Depth
37.8 cm
-2.1 cm (-5.3%) better
vs
39.9 cm
FRANKE FMYPL 906 BK benefits
Motor power
270 Wt
205 Wt (315.4%) better
vs
65 Wt
Intensive mode
vs
Filter contamination indicator
vs
Power of each lamp
7 Wt
5.5 Wt (366.7%) better
vs
1.5 Wt
Minimum embedding height
38.2 cm
-35.3 cm (-48%) better
vs
73.5 cm
Height
38.2 cm
-68.3 cm (-64.1%) better
vs
106.5 cm

Comparison of all specifications

Weissgauff Assy 60 TC BL FRANKE FMYPL 906 BK
Number of lighting lamps
2
1 (100%) better
1
Anti-return valve
Power of each lamp
1.5 Wt 7 Wt
5.5 Wt (366.7%) better
Filter contamination indicator
Intensive mode
Depth
37.8 cm
-2.1 cm (-5.3%) better
39.9 cm
Height
106.5 cm 38.2 cm
-68.3 cm (-64.1%) better
Width
59.5 cm
-30.3 cm (-33.7%) better
89.8 cm
Embedding depth
37.8 cm
-2.1 cm (-5.3%) better
39.9 cm
Minimum embedding height
73.5 cm 38.2 cm
-35.3 cm (-48%) better
Embedding width
59.5 cm
-30.3 cm (-33.7%) better
89.8 cm
Power cable length
1.3 m no data
Noise level
49 dB
-23 dB (-31.9%) better
72 dB
Remote control
Price-quality ratio
55.7
52.6 (1696.8%) better
3.1
USD
121
-1563 (-92.8%) better
1684
Timer
Display
Number of speeds
3 3
Number of engines
1 1
Motor power
65 Wt 270 Wt
205 Wt (315.4%) better
Maximum performance
1000 m³/h
190 m³/h (23.5%) better
810 m³/h
Popular comparisons